<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NoFollow vs DoFollow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2008/06/04/nofollow-vs-dofollow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2008/06/04/nofollow-vs-dofollow/</link>
	<description>World Outside my Window is a blog about controversial topics, blogging, humor, daily life, and the world as I see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:46:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle</title>
		<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2008/06/04/nofollow-vs-dofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-35262</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/?p=2379#comment-35262</guid>
		<description>Just thought I&#039;d update you on the dofollow movement. It&#039;s dead. So is nofollow. Google barely used it (they still indexed those sites and they turned up in search results) and other search engines failed to embrace it. If there is no nofollow, dofollow is just as much history.

It was a great idea but when Google failed to comply fully with its intentions, the rest was just buzz and conjecture, though bloggers still love to promote the dofollow claim. 

In a way, I wish it did count so we could put really put a hurt on comment spams and sploggers, but we just have to find anothe way to turn up the heat on them. Got any ideas? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I&#8217;d update you on the dofollow movement. It&#8217;s dead. So is nofollow. Google barely used it (they still indexed those sites and they turned up in search results) and other search engines failed to embrace it. If there is no nofollow, dofollow is just as much history.</p>
<p>It was a great idea but when Google failed to comply fully with its intentions, the rest was just buzz and conjecture, though bloggers still love to promote the dofollow claim. </p>
<p>In a way, I wish it did count so we could put really put a hurt on comment spams and sploggers, but we just have to find anothe way to turn up the heat on them. Got any ideas? <img src='http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2008/06/04/nofollow-vs-dofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-35238</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/?p=2379#comment-35238</guid>
		<description>Great info as usual. :smile: I always thought the you comment I follow means, you comment, I go to your website and comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info as usual. <img src='http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':smile:' class='wp-smiley' />  I always thought the you comment I follow means, you comment, I go to your website and comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose DesRochers</title>
		<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2008/06/04/nofollow-vs-dofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-35235</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose DesRochers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/?p=2379#comment-35235</guid>
		<description>Drowsey if it doesn&#039;t matter then why do you have a U Comment I Follow badge on your blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drowsey if it doesn&#8217;t matter then why do you have a U Comment I Follow badge on your blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryJay</title>
		<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2008/06/04/nofollow-vs-dofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-35230</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/?p=2379#comment-35230</guid>
		<description>I have to say I checked out the links given in the post and actually now understand the pros and c ons of the debate.  I am of the opinion, leave it alone , let it stand as google put in in.   LOL, flashing on a Fred and Ginger song---&quot;I say no-follow, you say Do-follow, no follow, do follow, lets call the whole thing off---&quot;  (man I shouldn&#039;t drink and blog,but its fun)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I checked out the links given in the post and actually now understand the pros and c ons of the debate.  I am of the opinion, leave it alone , let it stand as google put in in.   LOL, flashing on a Fred and Ginger song&#8212;&#8221;I say no-follow, you say Do-follow, no follow, do follow, lets call the whole thing off&#8212;&#8221;  (man I shouldn&#8217;t drink and blog,but its fun)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose DesRochers</title>
		<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2008/06/04/nofollow-vs-dofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-35227</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose DesRochers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/?p=2379#comment-35227</guid>
		<description>Dana, a hyperlink is a link you click on to go to another page.  Your name Dana is a hyperlink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dana, a hyperlink is a link you click on to go to another page.  Your name Dana is a hyperlink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
