<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogCatalog New Terms Unfair to Bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/</link>
	<description>World Outside my Window is a blog about controversial topics, blogging, humor, daily life, and the world as I see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:57:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rose DesRochers</title>
		<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-29901</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose DesRochers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/#comment-29901</guid>
		<description>The terms are now in place without my suggestion. The terms ask for a &quot;worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive license(s).&quot;


Since placing content on BlogCatalog, grants BlogCatalog a worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, display, modify, adapt and publish your work in connection with BlogCatalog website, be warned that they can now sell your content or make works derived from your work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The terms are now in place without my suggestion. The terms ask for a &#8220;worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive license(s).&#8221;</p>
<p>Since placing content on BlogCatalog, grants BlogCatalog a worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, display, modify, adapt and publish your work in connection with BlogCatalog website, be warned that they can now sell your content or make works derived from your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-29861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/#comment-29861</guid>
		<description>This sounds like someone at BlogCatalog needed a cookie.  I can&#039;t see why they would have disabled your accound when requesting feedback.  If I had cancelled a user&#039;s account whenever they raised a concern in a public forum, my boss would have handed me my a** followed immediately by walking papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like someone at BlogCatalog needed a cookie.  I can&#8217;t see why they would have disabled your accound when requesting feedback.  If I had cancelled a user&#8217;s account whenever they raised a concern in a public forum, my boss would have handed me my a** followed immediately by walking papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose DesRochers</title>
		<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-29799</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose DesRochers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/#comment-29799</guid>
		<description>Vijay,  what really gets me is that they deactivated my account and then added my suggestion to the proposed Terms of Service.

FFprod, I too had a discussion deleted that was not a request for a link exchange, but an offer for a one way link on my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vijay,  what really gets me is that they deactivated my account and then added my suggestion to the proposed Terms of Service.</p>
<p>FFprod, I too had a discussion deleted that was not a request for a link exchange, but an offer for a one way link on my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose DesRochers</title>
		<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-29798</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose DesRochers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/#comment-29798</guid>
		<description>John, what of proposed terms and if put into place can you not comprehend?

I&#039;m well aware what libel is and this is not even close to libel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, what of proposed terms and if put into place can you not comprehend?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m well aware what libel is and this is not even close to libel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffprod66</title>
		<link>http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-29789</link>
		<dc:creator>ffprod66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/24/blogcatalog-new-terms-unfair-to-bloggers/#comment-29789</guid>
		<description>My discussion on Blogcatalog was deleted after I started link-exchange for my blog. I couldn&#039;t read that rule anywhere because there are not rules written.  And discussion was deleted only after 4 days.
And why are link-exchanged banned? Technorati faves are not, Stumbles are not, Diggs are not. Ridiculous. 
One more thing. One can not introduce TOS AFTER they gathered large number of members.  With same logic they can change TOS in 2008 and enter new rule where every member have to pay $100 for membership or see you in court. Insane. And not ethical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My discussion on Blogcatalog was deleted after I started link-exchange for my blog. I couldn&#8217;t read that rule anywhere because there are not rules written.  And discussion was deleted only after 4 days.<br />
And why are link-exchanged banned? Technorati faves are not, Stumbles are not, Diggs are not. Ridiculous.<br />
One more thing. One can not introduce TOS AFTER they gathered large number of members.  With same logic they can change TOS in 2008 and enter new rule where every member have to pay $100 for membership or see you in court. Insane. And not ethical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
